votetrustusa.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the votetrustusa.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host votetrustusa.org. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Evocative Inc. .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.2.31 (FreeBSD) PHP/5.6.29 mod_ssl/2.2.31 OpenSSL/0.9.8zh-freebsd DAV/2 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home national states vendors get involved about us contact vtusa donate now! action alerts a national resource for state-based organizations working for secure, accurate and transparent elections. votetrustusa is a project of verified voting foundation. click here to visit the verified voting foundation website guide to the vtusa website electionaudits.org the nation's clearinghouse for election audit information! recommended reading from votetrustusa votetrustusa new from the news - press releases by verifiedvoting.org november 10, 2009 this site is now archived and is no longer being updated. please visit the verified voting blog: vvblog for current information on voting and elections. diebold quietly patches security flaw in vote counting software new from vendors - diebold by kim zetter august 12, 2009 this article appeared in wired.com's threat level blog and is rposted here with permission of the author. premier election solutions, formerly diebold, has patched a serious security weakness in its election tabulation software used in the majority of states, according to a lab that tested the new version and a federal commission that certified it. the flaw in the tabulation software was discovered by wired.com earlier this year, and involved the programs auditing logs. the logs failed to record significant events occurring on a computer running the software, including the act of someone deleting votes during or after an election. the logs also failed to record who performed an action on the system, and listed some events with the wrong date and timestamps. a new version of the software does record such events, and includes other security safeguards that would prevent the system from operating if the event log were somehow shut down, according to ibeta quality assurance, the colorado testing lab that examined the software for the federal government. its not known if premier will offer the more secure version to election officials who purchased previous software. the company did not respond to a call for comment tuesday. read more... eac certifies es&s; unity 3.2.0.0 voting system new from vendors - election systems and software (es&s;) by eac media release july 21, 2009 the u.s. election assistance commission (eac) today certified the unity 3.2.0.0 optical scan voting system by election systems & software to the 2002 voting system standards . it is the second voting system to achieve federal certification under the eac voting system testing and certification program. an eac certification means that a voting system has met the requirements of the federal guidelines by passing a series of comprehensive tests conducted by a federally accredited test laboratory. manufacturers of certified systems must also meet technical and ethical standards that ensure the integrity of the process and the system as it goes from the test lab to production and into the marketplace. laboratory test plans, test reports and related information about the unity 3.2.0.0 are posted at www.eac.gov, along with an outline describing each step of the certification process. read more... impressive unanimity: the historical significance of coleman v. franken new from states - minnesota by analysis by edward b. foley july 01, 2009 this analysis was published at minnpost.com . now that norm coleman has conceded in the aftermath of today's unanimous minnesota supreme court ruling, the eight-month-long battle to determine who won last november's election for the state's u.s. senate seat is finally over. even as the concession eclipses the opinion in political importanceand appropriately so the opinion will begin its life as one of the most legally significant resolutions of a disputed election in u.s. history. its historical significance lies in the fact that it is the first appellate court resolution of a major statewide election after bush v. gore. the seven-month dispute over washington's gubernatorial election of 2004 resulted in a trial court ruling, but it was never appealed. puerto rico's disputed gubernatorial election of the same year did result in a 4-3 decision of the puerto rico supreme court (as well as a federal appeals court decision declining to intervene), but that precedent lacks the direct relevance to future u.s. elections that today's decision has. today's opinion discusses bush v. gore and its treatment of that u.s. supreme court decision in the 2000 presidential election is the most important judicial analysis of that precedent to date. the reason for its importance is that it analyzes bush v. gore in a setting most comparable to bush v. gore itself: a post-election fight over which candidate won more votes. citations to bush v. gore in other contexts, like pre-election disputes over how to count provisional ballots, are merely invocations of that precedent for whatever analogical force it might have. coleman v. franken is a consideration of bush v. gore in a situation where it most closely applies. the minnesota supreme court opinion, like the unanimous trial court ruling it affirms, holds that the equal protection principle of bush v. gore is not violated when a state statute provides a clear and specific rule for local officials to follow in the counting of ballots, even if some local officials fail to follow that clear rule. as long as the local officials' failure to follow the clear and specific state rule, even if deliberate, was not designed to favor one candidate over another (or otherwise discriminate improperly among classes of citizens), that failurewhile regrettableis not unconstitutional. read the entire analysis at minnpost.com eac releases report on voter registration new from national issues - election assistance commission (eac) by eac media release july 01, 2009 the u.s. election assistance commission (eac) has released a report on voter registration statistics in accordance with the national voter registration act of 1993 (nvra). it presents information provided by the states on the number of registered voters, the registration process and voter registration list maintenance. the full report can be dowloaded here , and the data are available here . the report covers registration information from after the 2006 general election through the 2008 general election. the following highlights are among the findings. read more... new york times editorial: how to trust electronic voting new from national issues - federal legislation by the new york times june 22, 2009 the house leadership should make passing mr. holts bill a priority. few issues matter as much as ensuring that election results can be trusted. this editorial was published in the new york times on june 22, 2009 . electronic voting machines that do not produce a paper record of every vote cast cannot be trusted. in 2008, more than one-third of the states, including new jersey and texas, still did not require all votes to be recorded on paper. representative rush holt has introduced a good bill that would ban paperless electronic voting in all federal elections. congress should pass it while there is still time to get ready for 2010. in paperless electronic voting, voters mark their choices, and when the votes have all been cast, the machine spits out the results. there is no way to be sure that a glitch or intentional vote theft by malicious software or computer hacking did not change the outcome. if there is a close election, there is also no way of conducting a meaningful recount. mr. holts bill would require paper ballots to be used for every vote cast in november 2010. it would help prod election officials toward the best of the currently available technologies: optical-scan voting. with optical scans, voters fill out a paper ballot that is then read by computer much like a standardized test. the votes are counted quickly and efficiently by computer, but the paper ballot remains the official vote, which can then be recounted by hand. read more... verifiedvoting.org praise

URL analysis for votetrustusa.org

http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3022&itemid=51
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&itemid=1&limit=40&limitstart=80
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=4&itemid=26
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2988&itemid=26
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&itemid=1&limit=40&limitstart=40
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3017&itemid=26
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2992&itemid=26
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&itemid=1&limit=40&limitstart=120
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&itemid=1&limit=40&limitstart=200
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3008&itemid=51
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3016&itemid=113
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_frontpage&itemid=1&limit=40&limitstart=280
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2997&itemid=113
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3003&itemid=26
http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2986&itemid=26

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: VOTETRUSTUSA.ORG
Registry Domain ID: D105827703-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.tucows.com
Registrar URL: http://www.tucows.com
Updated Date: 2018-03-03T02:23:06Z
Creation Date: 2005-03-04T16:03:28Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-03-04T16:03:28Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: Tucows Inc.
Registrar IANA ID: 69
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4165350123
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registrant Organization: Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.
Registrant State/Province: PA
Registrant Country: US
Name Server: NS2.EPPI.COM
Name Server: NS1.EPPI.COM
Name Server: NS3.EPPI.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form https://www.icann.org/wicf/)
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2018-07-30T05:34:29Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

Access to Public Interest Registry WHOIS information is provided to assist persons in determining the contents of a domain name registration record in the Public Interest Registry registry database. The data in this record is provided by Public Interest Registry for informational purposes only, and Public Interest Registry does not guarantee its accuracy. This service is intended only for query-based access. You agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances will you use this data to (a) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission by e-mail, telephone, or facsimile of mass unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations to entities other than the data recipient's own existing customers; or (b) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that send queries or data to the systems of Registry Operator, a Registrar, or Afilias except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or modify existing registrations. All rights reserved. Public Interest Registry reserves the right to modify these terms at any time. By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS votetrustusa.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME votetrustusa.org

  HANDLE D105827703-LROR

  CREATED 2005-04-03

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS2.EPPI.COM 66.211.106.15

  NS1.EPPI.COM 69.163.36.250

  NS3.EPPI.COM 66.211.106.7

OWNER

  ORGANIZATION Verified Voting Foundation, Inc.

ADDRESS

  STATE PA

  COUNTRY US

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .